{"id":38042,"date":"2004-07-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2004-07-30T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/reviews\/25th-anniversary-box-set\/"},"modified":"2004-07-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2004-07-30T00:00:00","slug":"25th-anniversary-box-set","status":"publish","type":"review","link":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/reviews\/25th-anniversary-box-set\/","title":{"rendered":"25th Anniversary Box Set"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here&#8217;s a rhetorical question: Does a band really need to put out<br \/>\ntwo boxed sets within five years of each other?<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s the question one would have to ask of Ian Anderson, the<br \/>\nliving, breathing force behind Jethro Tull. It was one thing for<br \/>\nAnderson to help compile<br \/>\n<i>20 Years Of Jethro Tull<\/i>, a set which did a good job of<br \/>\nchronicling the band&#8217;s history up to their comeback (if one could<br \/>\nreally use that term, since the group never went away). But to<br \/>\nrelease a set like<br \/>\n<i>25th Anniversary Box Set<\/i> &#8212; a set which cost me $80 back in<br \/>\nthe day, and which is now out-of-print &#8212; just five years later,<br \/>\nand feature precious little new material, was a questionable<br \/>\nmove.<\/p>\n<p>When I first listened to it shortly after buying it, I believed<br \/>\nI had gotten royally ripped off. Dusting it off for the first time<br \/>\nin a decade as part of this retrospective on Tull, I was able to<br \/>\nappreciate some of the nuances I hadn&#8217;t seen the first time around<br \/>\n&#8212; and, indeed, the performances are pleasant enough. Yet one has<br \/>\nto wonder whether there was something better that Anderson could<br \/>\nhave provided the fans with &#8212; say, the boxed set of bootleg<br \/>\nrecordings promised in the booklet which has never<br \/>\nmaterialized.<\/p>\n<p>First things first: there is absolutely no reason that Anderson<br \/>\nneeded to include a disc of Jethro Tull&#8217;s &#8220;classic&#8221; songs remixed,<br \/>\nfor a few reasons. First, he absolutely butchered &#8220;Songs From The<br \/>\nWood&#8221; &#8212; Ian, I love ya, but you don&#8217;t fix what ain&#8217;t broken, bub.<br \/>\nSecond, no matter what, long-time fans were going to find something<br \/>\nmissing from this collection. Third &#8212; and most importantly &#8212;<br \/>\nthere are so many best-of collections out there (even back in 1993)<br \/>\nthat it was sheer redundancy to re-package them again.<\/p>\n<p>The two discs&#8217; worth of live material &#8212; one from Carnegie Hall<br \/>\nin 1970, the other featuring performances from around the world &#8212;<br \/>\nprove to be the shining stars in this set. To hear the maturation<br \/>\nof the band &#8212; and especially to hear the rest of the show that was<br \/>\nfirst featured on<br \/>\n<i>Living In The Past<\/i> &#8212; is something worthwhile for fans of<br \/>\nall ages. Granted, the newer material (or the more recent<br \/>\nrecordings) don&#8217;t seem to pack as great of a punch, but when you<br \/>\nhear Anderson take on &#8220;A Song For Jeffrey&#8221; (the third version on<br \/>\nthis set) from 1993, you can&#8217;t help but hear Anderson time warp<br \/>\nback to 1968 in his vocal style.<\/p>\n<p>This leaves one disc &#8212; &#8220;The Beacon&#8217;s Bottom Tapes&#8221; &#8212; which<br \/>\nfeatures the band recording &#8220;live in the studio&#8221; remakes of old<br \/>\nclassics. This isn&#8217;t as successful of an experiment as Anderson may<br \/>\nhave hoped, but there is a kitsch factor to this disc which even<br \/>\nthe long-time fans have to appreciate. After all, if one goes to<br \/>\nsee Jethro Tull in concert today, this is what you can expect the<br \/>\nband to sound like.<\/p>\n<p>Yet the question still remains: did the world really need<br \/>\nanother multi-disc box set from Jethro Tull? Honestly, the answer<br \/>\nis &#8220;no.&#8221; Had this been pared down to a two-disc set, maybe just<br \/>\nfocusing on live recordings of Tull through the years, it would<br \/>\nhave been a more powerful collection. As it stands, there are<br \/>\nmoments of grandeur on<br \/>\n<i>25th Anniversary Box Set<\/i>, but this is one that is truly for<br \/>\nthe completists only.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":26770,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"artist":[5643],"rating":[5614],"class_list":["post-38042","review","type-review","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","artist-jethro-tull","rating-rating-c-plus"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/review\/38042","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/review"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/review"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38042"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/review\/38042\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/26770"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38042"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"artist","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/artist?post=38042"},{"taxonomy":"rating","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rating?post=38042"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}