{"id":44978,"date":"2017-06-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2017-06-07T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/reviews\/chicago-16-2\/"},"modified":"2017-06-07T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2017-06-07T00:00:00","slug":"chicago-16-2","status":"publish","type":"review","link":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/reviews\/chicago-16-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Chicago 16"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0in; line-height: 100%\">By 1982, the hits had dried up for Chicago. They were in the process of moving from their long-time label home of Columbia to Warner Brothers, and enlisted the help of producer David Foster to help make them relevant again. In the process, they fully embraced their radio-friendly pop sound which they had been slowly cultivating for several years, the end result being <i>Chicago 16<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; line-height: 100%\">And the end result? Two words: Ho-hum. <\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; line-height: 100%\">Yes, this disc gave Peter Cetera and crew two hits with \u201cLove Me Tomorrow\u201d and \u201cHard To Say I&#8217;m Sorry \/ Get Away,\u201d but overall this is an absolute snooze-fest, full of light pop fluff that barely catches the ear, much less the interest, of the listener. <\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; line-height: 100%\">Now, I&#8217;ll be completely up-front: I&#8217;ve always hated \u201cHard For Me To Say I&#8217;m Sorry \/ Get Away,\u201d dating back to when it was first released as a single. For me, it was just the antithesis of everything that Chicago had been to that point \u2013 and I am well aware that they had long since abandoned the guise of avant-garde rockers that made up the first part of their career. But at least those early power-pop hits had some frickin&#8217; <i>substance<\/i> \u2013 I mean, I won&#8217;t turn off \u201cIf You Leave Me Now\u201d when I hear it on satellite radio. But I will dive-bomb for the channel button when this comes on, even to this day. <\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; line-height: 100%\">That said, \u201cLove Me Tomorrow\u201d does feel more like what Chicago had been up to this point, and is ample proof that they still were able to craft a song and make it interesting. Yes, it&#8217;s still power-pop, but it&#8217;s got some meat to it as well. <\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; line-height: 100%\">The problem with the bulk of <i>Chicago 16<\/i> is not Foster&#8217;s production work; rather, it is the sub-par songwriting that just fails to break any new ground \u2013 or, at the least, keep things listenable. When tracks like \u201cWaiting For You To Decide,\u201d \u201cChains\u201d and \u201cSonny Think Twice\u201d all blend together into an unrecognizable mush, then no amount of fancy production work is going to make these any more listenable. Simply put, you can&#8217;t turn a Yugo into a Rolls-Royce. <\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; line-height: 100%\">Commercially, you could say that <i>Chicago 16<\/i> was an improvement over their previous studio effort, <i>Chicago XIV<\/i>. (Their fifteenth album was technically a greatest hits collection, and did not have the number in the title.) And, yes, \u201cLove Me Tomorrow\u201d is a decent song. It&#8217;s just a shame that the listener has to plow through landmine after landmine to get to the one good track, stuck at the end of the disc. <\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; line-height: 100%\">Chicago did gain back popularity with this disc, and would be vaulted back into superstardom one disc later. But taken as a whole, <i>Chicago 16<\/i> is the equivalent of a sleeping pill pressed into vinyl or compact disc, and aside from the radio hits (even if I don&#8217;t like the one song), is hardly worth your time. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":28576,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"artist":[5830],"rating":[11205],"class_list":["post-44978","review","type-review","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","artist-chicago","rating-rating-d-plus"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/review\/44978","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/review"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/review"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44978"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/review\/44978\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/28576"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44978"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"artist","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/artist?post=44978"},{"taxonomy":"rating","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dailyvault.adishjain.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rating?post=44978"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}