Chicago 16

Label: Warner Bros.Year: 1982Artist Website: www.chicagotheband.com
4 Min Read

By 1982, the hits had dried up for Chicago. They were in the process of moving from their long-time label home of Columbia to Warner Brothers, and enlisted the help of producer David Foster to help make them relevant again. In the process, they fully embraced their radio-friendly pop sound which they had been slowly cultivating for several years, the end result being Chicago 16.

And the end result? Two words: Ho-hum.

Yes, this disc gave Peter Cetera and crew two hits with “Love Me Tomorrow” and “Hard To Say I’m Sorry / Get Away,” but overall this is an absolute snooze-fest, full of light pop fluff that barely catches the ear, much less the interest, of the listener.

Now, I’ll be completely up-front: I’ve always hated “Hard For Me To Say I’m Sorry / Get Away,” dating back to when it was first released as a single. For me, it was just the antithesis of everything that Chicago had been to that point – and I am well aware that they had long since abandoned the guise of avant-garde rockers that made up the first part of their career. But at least those early power-pop hits had some frickin’ substance – I mean, I won’t turn off “If You Leave Me Now” when I hear it on satellite radio. But I will dive-bomb for the channel button when this comes on, even to this day.

That said, “Love Me Tomorrow” does feel more like what Chicago had been up to this point, and is ample proof that they still were able to craft a song and make it interesting. Yes, it’s still power-pop, but it’s got some meat to it as well.

The problem with the bulk of Chicago 16 is not Foster’s production work; rather, it is the sub-par songwriting that just fails to break any new ground – or, at the least, keep things listenable. When tracks like “Waiting For You To Decide,” “Chains” and “Sonny Think Twice” all blend together into an unrecognizable mush, then no amount of fancy production work is going to make these any more listenable. Simply put, you can’t turn a Yugo into a Rolls-Royce.

Commercially, you could say that Chicago 16 was an improvement over their previous studio effort, Chicago XIV. (Their fifteenth album was technically a greatest hits collection, and did not have the number in the title.) And, yes, “Love Me Tomorrow” is a decent song. It’s just a shame that the listener has to plow through landmine after landmine to get to the one good track, stuck at the end of the disc.

Chicago did gain back popularity with this disc, and would be vaulted back into superstardom one disc later. But taken as a whole, Chicago 16 is the equivalent of a sleeping pill pressed into vinyl or compact disc, and aside from the radio hits (even if I don’t like the one song), is hardly worth your time.

Share This Article
BORN: 1970 JOINED THE DV STAFF: Joined?!? I founded the fargin' place! HOMETOWN: Chicago, IL (go Cubs!) NOW LIVING IN: Kenosha, IL SPOUSE/KIDS: Dawn / three of my own, three stepchildren (none of whom are kids anymore) FAVORITE ARTIST: AC/DC OTHER ARTISTS I LIKE: Geez, got a year? Anthrax, Black Sabbath, Miles Davis, Eddie Harris, Melissa Etheridge, Frank Zappa, Grateful Dead, Phish, Led Zeppelin, Sur Sudha, Dave Uhrich, Rick Wakeman, Joe Satriani, Motorhead, Thelonious Monk, The Who, XTC... the list is endless, really. BEER: Nope... sorry. The older I get, the less I discover I desire the old moonshine. Cherry Dr. Pepper Zero for me, thank you. OTHER HOBBIES: Playing guitar and working on my music (and dreading the day someone from the site critiques it), reading, continuing to fall behind on my DVD collection. PERSONAL MOTTO: "Never judge a man until you've walked a mile in his shoes. That way, if he's an asshole, you've got his shoes and you're a mile away." - Rev. Billy C. Wirtz I WRITE MUSIC REVIEWS BECAUSE: ...I've got 25-plus years' experience in this field. Do I really need a reason?

Album Cover

Search

Weather

Weather
30°C
Florida
clear sky
31° _ 30°
69%
Thu
34 °C
Fri
34 °C
Sat
34 °C
Sun
33 °C
Mon
29 °C
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *